Current:Home > Stocks3 reasons you probably won't get the maximum Social Security benefit -WealthRoots Academy
3 reasons you probably won't get the maximum Social Security benefit
Charles H. Sloan View
Date:2025-04-11 06:44:51
The maximum monthly Social Security benefit is $4,873 per month in 2024, which is a pretty huge amount of money to get every single month from the government.
Unfortunately, it's very unlikely that most retirees will get anywhere near that amount. In fact, here are three key reasons why your own Social Security checks will probably be much lower than the highest possible monthly check.
1. You need to earn a lot of money to max out your benefits
The Social Security benefits formula is designed to replace around 40% of pre-retirement earnings for most workers and replaces even less for high earners. So, obviously, to end up with a monthly benefit of $4,873, your salary would have had to be far higher than that amount over your career.
Want income for life?Hurt by inflation, Americans yearn for pensions in retirement. One answer may be annuities.
Specifically, you would have had to earn the inflation-adjusted equivalent of $168,600 throughout your career. Wondering why that number? It's the 2024 wage base limit, and the wage base limit changes over time due to wage growth.
The wage base limit is the reason why there's a maximum Social Security benefit in the first place. To ensure people don't get tens of thousands of dollars a month in Social Security benefits, there's a cap on the amount of wages included in the benefits formula.
If you earn the wage base limit or higher for every year of work included in the benefits calculation, then you'll have the highest possible average wage. That's the number used by Social Security to determine your benefits, so maxing out average wages is a requirement of getting the biggest payout possible.
Unfortunately, each year, only around 6% of workers have earnings above the wage base limit. That means 94% don't -- and if you're in that 94% for most of your career, the max benefit isn't within reach for you.
2. You need to max out your wages for a full 35 years
The benefits formula used to calculate Social Security doesn't just take all of your wages for each year and divide them by the number of years worked in order to calculate average wages. Instead, the inflation-adjusted wages from your 35 highest-earning years are used.
The largest possible average benefit, therefore, is available only to people who earned at least the wage base limit for 35 years. Now, this doesn't mean every single year of your career had to a high-earning one. Just 35 of them. If you worked for 40 years and you made very little during five of those years, you could still max out your benefit as long as your earnings equaled or exceeded the wage base limit for the other 35.
On the flip side, if even one year was included in your calculation where you earned less than the wage base limit, the max benefit is off the table.
3. You must claim your benefits at age 70
Finally, there's one more reason you probably aren't getting the max benefit. It's the fact you'd have to wait until 70 to claim your first Social Security check.
Even if you've got 35 years of high earnings under your belt, this just gives you the highest possible standard Social Security benefit. To get the maximum monthly income, you'd have to earn as many delayed retirement credits as possible to increase your standard benefit to the upper limit.
Delayed retirement credits are earned each month you wait beyond your full retirement age to get a Social Security check. Since they can be earned until 70, you have to wait until then to claim your first retirement payment. And this isn't very common because that's simply too long for most people to work and many folks have to claim their benefits upon retiring to get enough support.
Now, just because you probably won't earn the max benefit doesn't mean you should be discouraged. You can still increase your own checks by putting off claiming and taking steps to boost your income during your working life. But you should be aware your Social Security check is probably going to be a lot smaller than $4,873 and plan accordingly when setting retirement savings goals.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Church parking near stadiums scores big in a win-win for faith congregations and sports fans
- Many people struggle with hair loss, but here's what they should know
- Amid concern about wider war, Americans give mixed reactions to Biden's approach toward Israel-Hamas conflict
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS Drops New Shapewear Collection That Looks Just Like Clothes
- Eating red meat more than once a week linked to Type 2 diabetes risk, study finds
- Nigerians remember those killed or detained in the 2020 protests against police brutality
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Philippine military ordered to stop using artificial intelligence apps due to security risks
Ranking
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Get $90 Worth of Olaplex Hair Products for Just $63
- How Summer House's Lindsay Hubbard Is Doing 2 Months After Carl Radke Breakup
- 2 killed, 2 escape house fire in Reno; 1 firefighter hospitalized
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- How Summer House's Lindsay Hubbard Is Doing 2 Months After Carl Radke Breakup
- University of Virginia says campus shooting investigation finished, findings to be released later
- Refugee children’s education in Rwanda under threat because of reduced UN funding
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
How a hidden past, a name change and GPS led to Katrina Smith's killer
Baltimore to pay $48 million to 3 men wrongly imprisoned for decades in ‘Georgetown jacket’ killing
Natalee Holloway fought like hell moments before death, her mom says after Joran van der Sloot's murder confession
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
No. 2 Michigan suspends staffer after NCAA launches investigating into allegations of sign-stealing
The Republicans who opposed Jim Jordan on the third ballot — including 3 new votes against him
Month after pig heart transplant, Maryland man pushing through tough physical therapy